On Mon, 2011-05-23 at 20:16 -0500, Kyle Willmon wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:51:59PM +0200, Jérôme Warnier wrote: > > There does not seem to be any development ongoing at all. It seems dead > > upstream. > > I'm considering moving to a more powerful alternative (fail2ban). > > I have spoken with Phil Schwartz, the upstream maintainer, in attempt to > introduce some more transparency and agility in the development process. > It appears that the next release of denyhosts has been held up by a few > technical issues which I am hoping to help resolve. While I would not > blame you for using fail2ban, I did want to inform you that denyhosts > should be seeing some activity in the near future.
Good to know. > As for this particular bug, the current issue is simply that Dropbear > does not use TCP Wrapper as OpenSSH does. This means that denyhost's > current method of using /etc/hosts.deny would not work for Dropbear. I > believe this is enough reason to tag this bug wontfix, but because it is > an upstream bug, I will let Phil make the final call. Allright, I clearly didn't look so far. Feel free to tag it as wontfix. And thanks for caring. > Thanks > - > Kyle Willmon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
