On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:28:16AM +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 04:45:10PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > > 2011/5/13 Dominic Hargreaves <[email protected]>: > > > On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 08:59:29AM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: > > >> I made the patch which changed the optimization level of utf8.c from O2 > > >> to O1. > > >> I understand that it is not right solutuon, I need to revise gcc. > > >> Would you apply this patch until gcc is revised? > > > > > > Yes, this is possible; it would be nice to have a gcc bug report to > > > point at so that we can keep track of this, though. > > > > > Thanks. I just forward bug to gcc[0]. > > There's no need to set the forwarded field on this bug, which is more > about tracking a workaround. But now we have a reference for the issue > we can add a comment to that effect in the (hopefully temporary) patch > working around the problem. We'll hopefully add that in the next upload.
Hello again, I noticed that this a fix has been found in gcc at <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49186> - I'm now wondering whether it would be best to work to get that fix integrated into gcc in Debian rather than adding the workaround to perl at this point. Thanks, Dominic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
