I believe Michael is right and I'll change that tonight. - L.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Barak A. Pearlmutter [mailto:ba...@cs.nuim.ie] > Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2011 4:45 PM > To: Michael Biebl > Cc: 628...@bugs.debian.org; debian-...@lists.debian.org; Leon Bottou > Subject: Re: Bug#628800: FTBFS on kfreebsd-*: libdjvulibre.so: undefined > reference to symbol 'pthread_cancel@@GLIBC_2.3' > > > I just wanted to mention, that there is a difference between > > > > *kfreebsd*-yes (my proposed patch) > > and > > *freebsd*-yes (what was merged upstream [1]) > > > > afaik the freebsds don't use the glibc userland and I'm not sure if > > the thread libs on freebsd behave like the one on kfreebsd, so I just > > wanted to verify that what you merged upstream is intentional and the > > missing 'k' is not an oversight. > > I'm not sure: upstream did that patch independently of yours, and I saw it > looked about the same and blindly merged it. > > I'm CCing this message to upstream to let it be addressed directly. > > But I will close with a parenthetical grouse: isn't this exactly the sort of tedious > system-by-system manual non-future-proof groveling that autotools is > supposed to abolish? Could this be tested automatically using existing > autoconf macros? > > --Barak. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
