Hi Sven, Sven-Haegar Koch wrote:
> While upgrading from libc6 2.13-4 to 2.13-5 on a i386 system: > > Preparing to replace libc6 2.13-4 (using .../archives/libc6_2.13-5_i386.deb) > ... > Unpacking replacement libc6 ... > Setting up libc6 (2.13-5) ... > Installing new version of config file /etc/ld.so.conf.d/i486-linux-gnu.conf > ... > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dynamic-link.h: 62: elf_get_dynamic_info: > Assertion `! "bad dynamic tag"' failed! Very odd. That assertion doesn't exist in current glibc; in fact, it was was removed in glibc 2.3! (cvs/glibc-2-3~925, elf/dynamic-link.h (elf_get_dynamic_info): Don't abort on unknown dynamic tags, 2002-04-03). But it was in an inline function in that header, so if some binary package was built on a machine with ancient libc6-dev, that could be a half-explanation. Where do you get your binary packages from? Puzzled, Jonathan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
