Bill Allombert <bill.allomb...@math.u-bordeaux1.fr> writes: > Note that I did not ask for second. > However lintian does not appear to be exercising such restrain:
[...] > This is happens even for package that build a single binary whether > arch-all or arch-indep, which does not seems terribly useful. It's a warning, not an error. I do think that providing those targets is best practice. If enough packages move in that direction, we can make the targets mandatory, just like binary-arch and binary-indep, in time. That's by far the simplest solution to this problem. The other advantage of Lintian warning on this is that it means we're now collecting that data for the whole archive. -- Russ Allbery (r...@debian.org) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
