On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 05:00:57AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2011-07-06 at 19:49 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Ben Hutchings wrote[1]: > > > > > We got this fix via 2.6.26.7: > > [...] > > > [CIFS] make sure we have the right resume info before calling > > > CIFSFindNext > > [...] > > > But it requires these additional fixes which we're missing for some > > > reason: > > > > > > commit b77d753c413e02559669df66e543869dad40c847 > > > Author: Steve French <sfre...@us.ibm.com> > > > Date: Wed Oct 8 19:13:46 2008 +0000 > > > > > > [CIFS] Check that last search entry resume key is valid > > > > This one does not seem to be part of Willy Tarreau's v2.6.27.y tree. > > Should it be? > > I assume so, but Steve should confirm or deny.
Interestingly I notice that a number of CIFS changes that were applied between 2.6.27 and 2.6.28 were not backported (just checked git logs for cifssmb.c) : 331c31351044888916805c9cb32d8bb9e40c12e9 cifs: fix buffer overrun in parse_DFS_referrals 2c55608f28444c3f33b10312881384c470ceed56 Fixed parsing of mount options when doing DFS submount 9a8165fce724d1aba21e2c713ac6ba11dbfecafa cifs: track DeletePending flag in cifsInodeInfo b77d753c413e02559669df66e543869dad40c847 [CIFS] Check that last search entry resume key is valid 391e575556109744ae0aa198c1e245588a3ea76a cifs: remove NULL termination from rename target in CIFSSMBRenameOpenFI 6d22f09896c0d62c003ffa25fff25323e3ed608b cifs: add function to set file disposition Their description makes me think that at least the 5 first ones need to be backported, but I may be wrong since I don't know their implications. Steve, it would be ver kind of you if you could take a few minutes to check them and confirm/deny the backport for each of them. If you think other patches are missing, please do not hesitate to tell me so. Cheers, Willy -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
