On 07/12/2011 07:50 AM, Mike O'Connor wrote: > Source: nova > Version: 2011.2-1 > Severity: serious > Justification: Policy 12.5 > > > In reviewing this source package, I find several problems with the copyright > file: > > tools/ajaxterm/sarissa* are LGPL, but this is not mentioned in > debian/copyright. The rest of ajaxterm is public domain > > In the smoketests directory, i find: openwrt-x86-ext2.image > openwrt-x86-vmlinuz > one seems to be a kernel, the other an ext2 image with a kernel and grub. The > licenses for these are not mentioned in debian/copyright, and I do not find > source for these > > The license and copyright notice from nova/virt/xenapi/fake.py does not appear > > contrib/boto_v6 is under a MIT like license that is not mentioned in > debian/copyright, nor are its copyright holders > > bin/nova-manage carries a BSD license which is not mentioned in > debian/copyright, nor are its copyright holders > > bye, > stew
Hi, Thanks for this bug report. As you may know, nova is coming from Ubuntu, and the copyright file has been written by them. I will forward this report, and work with them to have it fixed in both Debian and Ubuntu. Thomas Goirand (zigo) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
