Hi again,

[...]
> > Just quickly browsed over 587657 - is there anything I could do as sat4j
> > maintainer? As said above, I'm ok uploading multiple source packages to 
> > carry
> > different versions. Not that I would be a really beautiful solution, but if 
> > it
> > helps to take some burden off of you eclipse maintainers, I'd be happy to 
> > offer
> > that kind of help!
> > 
> 
> Not sure how it will help unless the second version is frozen to the
> needs of eclipse... and it would not protect us from the lucene2
> maintainers, who sometimes also wants to upload a new version.  The best
> long term solution would to get a fix for [1].
> 
> [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=351485
> 
[...]

Well, yes, the intend would be to upload this old version of sat4j as a new
source package solely to make eclipse happy. But obviously this will only fix
sat4j-related problems, not the more general one. But if that already helps, I
can surely do so. It's a hack, but as long as eclipse can't be fixed, there may
be a need for such hacks.

If the eclipse maintainer team comes to the conclusion that this would be of
help, please just file a bug against sat4j and I'll try to address this as soon
as I can.

Best,
Michael


Attachment: pgpqXxdhqof1f.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to