On Sat, 23 Jul 2011, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> * Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn [110723 14:14 +0200]:
> > On Sat, 23 Jul 2011, Elimar Riesebieter wrote:
> > > * Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn [110723 11:46 +0200]:
> > >
> > > > Package: libasound2
> > > > Version: 1.0.24.1-2
> > > > Severity: normal
> > > [...]
> > > >          Breaks: bluez-alsa (<= 4.94-2), ...
> > > >
> > > > and led to bluez-alsa being removed.
> > > >
> > > > Jordi, could you please advise on which steps need to be taken to
> > > > get bluez-alsa back?  I think the bluez package maintainer
> > > > Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <[email protected]> would also need that
> > > > information.
> > >
> > > I guess just a rebuild against libasound2-dev (>=1.0.24.1) is needed.
> >
> > Thing is debian/control has that header hard coded like that.
>
> Breaks: ..... bluez-alsa (<= 4.94-2)
>
> > Would a rebuild against libasound2-dev (>=1.0.24.1) help, in that case?
>
> A rebuild should be minimum 4.94-3, isn't it?

Alright.  Took a while.  Sorry for being thick.  Got it now :)
You meant rebuild _bluez_ against libasound2-dev (>=1.0.24.1).


-- 
Cristian



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]

Reply via email to