On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 19:39:03 +1000, Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Read the posts on the debian-qt-kde mailing list and the C++ ABI
transition announcement on debian-devel-announce, which clearly explain
that this is intended behavior.
I am not subscribed to this mailing list, and if apt removing 200 packages
to install qcad is 'intended behaviour' then I think maybe the bug should
be reported in apt.
If this is intended behaviour, then why is the bug fixable by a slight
change to debian/control from qt3 to qt3c102, followed by a recompile?
And my suggestion of adding a 'Replaces' line to various XXXc102 packages,
would alieviate any of these problems, since I thought that was *EXACTLY*
what it was made for.. when packages change name?
Either way, why close this bug when it (as you acknowledge) still exists.
Just because its 'intended behaviour' doesnt mean its not a grave bug.
David Murn
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
