On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 06:35:15PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote: > Package: texlive-latex-extra > Tags: patch
> 3) ucshyper does not actually need the output mode to be PDF, nor the > TeX implementation to be pdfTeX. I just _removed_ the above test, > as well as the following line: > \RequirePackage[pdftex,unicode]{hyperref} > So possibly this test should be changed to something like: > \ifdefined\PrerenderUnicode\else% > \PackageWarning{ucshyper}{ucshyper needs to be run with > inputenc utf8x.\MessageBreak Disabling functionality}% > \expandafter\endinput\fi > _and_ still remove the > \RequirePackage[pdftex,unicode]{hyperref} > line so that users can choose their own hyperref driver freely. Maybe > add instead: > \ifdefined\hypersetup% > \hypersetup{unicode=true}% > \else% > \PackageWarning{ucshyper}{ucshyper needs to be loaded after > hyperref.\MessageBreak Disabling functionality}% > \expandafter\endinput% > \fi% I downloaded the texlive-extra (Debian) source package; it contains ucshyper.sty, which says it is generated from ucs.dtx, but does not contain ucs.dtx. So 1) I cannot prepare a "real proper" patch. 2) This looks like an RC bug to me, not shipping the preferred form for modification in the source package. Additionally, browsing the upstream SVN, I found neither ucs.dtx, nor ucshyper.sty, but probably I just didn't look in the right place. -- Lionel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org