[Resending as forgot to include the bug report in previous email] On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:24:32AM -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Julian Gilbey wrote: > > As at least two of us have said, this is *not* the case: I have *only* > > used packages from testing, and it affects testing as well. > > I trust you. But I must be missing something: could you fill me in? > > According to > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.changes.testing/498 > > the version of util-linux in testing moved from 2.17.2-9.1 to 2.19.1-4 > in one jump two weeks ago. According to > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.changes.unstable/235955 > > and the util-linux changelog, 2.19.1-1 was only uploaded to > experimental. How did it get into testing?
My bad - you are, indeed, correct. I had forgotten where my installation of 2.19.1-1 came from. There was a problem a while ago with 2.17.2-9.1 not working with fusermount or encfs or something like that, so I upgraded bsdutils, libblkid1, libuuid1, mount, util-linux, util-linux-locales, uuid-dev and uuid-runtime to version 2.19.1-1 to fix this. So that explains that. Apologies for the confusion, Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
