Hi, just a short comment because of a very recent announcement:
Axel Beckert wrote: > > I would have used xz instead of bzip2, though, as xz-utils is "Priority: > > required", but people would find that to be too aggressive. :-) > > IIRC was there also something that we just can use it in unstable only > when dpkg in Stable supports it already. But as xz support is in dpkg > in Squeeze (see http://bugs.debian.org/542160), I'd say that would be > ok, too. And the archive software (dak, etc.) needs to support it, too. And it does that since just today: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2011/08/msg00001.html :-) > Nevertheless, to get that thing running, I'd stay with bzip2 at least > for this upload. That's still my opinion, though. :-) Regards, Axel -- ,''`. | Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/ : :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin `. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org