On 08/12/2011 11:21 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote: > In such case, I would suggest *not* marking templates as translatable > if you think they will be modified in subsequent uploads.
ok, so i'll do that then. > Still, I don't really understand the logic: if you upload a package > with debconf templates, their wording and their behaviour has been > reasonably well-tested, no? So, why should they be heavily changed? behaviour and code yes, but not the wording. > So, should I close the bug report, get rid of the review...and just > tell translators "wait for......dunno what....before translating"? i'll upload in a minute a new version, marked as non-translatable. once i mark it translatable, feel free to review/translate it. -- Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern Email: daniel.baum...@progress-technologies.net Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
