On mer., 2011-02-23 at 13:36 +0100, Yves-Alexis Perez wrote: > On mer., 2011-01-26 at 14:54 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote: > > > > > > > http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-maint/linux-grsec-base.git;a=summary > > > if > > > > > needed. > > > > Why is this not part of the patch below? > > > The grsec.conf was attached to the initial bug report. As there is > > no > > > easy way to ship an external file in the linux-image, I was told > > it'd be > > > a better idea to make an external package and that helps because I > > can > > > do the user creation there and add a README. > > > > External _binary_ package, not source package. > > What's the correct way to add a new binary package to linux-2.6. I've > checked the current package and there's the xen-linux-system package > which seems to be xen specific. It has some templates files in > debian/templates and some specific treatment in > debian/bin/gencontrol.py. > > Should I add some templates too and modify the gencontrol.py to create > that new binary package or should I refrain to touch it.
I've tried to add templates but it still lacks the proper gencontrol.py logic. Any indication on what exactly is needed there would help. > > > > > > > +CONFIG_DEBUG_STRICT_USER_COPY_CHECKS=y > > > > Please show why this should not be enabled globaly. > > > Good point, it should. I'll make a separated bug report. > > > > No need for a bug. > > What's the status for this? Current 2.6.37 builds fine with that option > enabled. So there /was/ a need for a bug, since this got completely lost. This is #639919 Regards, -- Yves-Alexis Perez ANSSI/ACE/LAM
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
