We already wrap access syscall to more intuitive behaviour, we should try to do the same also for faccessat.
Pending for next eglibc upload.
So relying on this is actually a bug in dash? (and there's probably no easy way to check how faccessat is behaving right?)
Yes, and yes. Petr -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
