El Domingo 11 Septiembre 2005 23:14, Itai Seggev escribió: > Package: mozilla-firefox-theme-rtlclassic > Version: 1.0.4lang20050515-1 > Severity: normal > > I tried installing the Firefox 1.5 beta from experimental, which forced > the removal of mozilla-firefox-theme-rtlclassic. However, this didn't > suceed: > > Removing mozilla-firefox-theme-rtlclassic ... > /var/lib/dpkg/info/mozilla-firefox-theme-rtlclassic.postrm: line 12: > update-mozilla-firefox-chrome: command not found > dpkg: error processing mozilla-firefox-theme-rtlclassic (--remove): > subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 127 >
If I understand correctly, you tried to install firefox using dpkg -i mozilla-firefox_1.4.99+1.5beta1.dfsg-1_i386.deb Then, when you execute apt or aptitude, it tries to delete mozilla-firefox-theme-rtlclassic, but it fails because update-mozilla-firefox-chrome is not included in Firefox version 1.5. However, I don't think it is a bug in mozilla-firefox-theme-rtlclassic. The package has the correct dependence in the right version (Depends: mozilla-firefox (>= 1.0-3), mozilla-firefox (<< 1.0.999)). If you upgrade using apt or aptitude it does the correct thing (at least in my tests): it removes mozilla-firefox-theme-rtlclassic and then it upgrades firefox. Then no problem is found. The problem is that you use dpkg (I guess) to install the new version, which breaks the dependences but it doesn't warn you about that. Maybe that is a bug in dpkg?? Please, correct me if I'm wrong in my guesses... César > -- System Information: > Debian Release: testing/unstable > APT prefers unstable > APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, > 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash > Kernel: Linux 2.6.12cavy1 > Locale: LANG=he_IL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=he_IL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) > > Versions of packages mozilla-firefox-theme-rtlclassic depends on: > hi mozilla-firefox 1.0.99+deerpark-alpha2-1 lightweight web browser based > on M > > mozilla-firefox-theme-rtlclassic recommends no packages. > > -- no debconf information
