On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 12:55, Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 09:21 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: >> 2011/9/6 Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk>: >> > On Tue, 2011-09-06 at 01:26 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: >> >> nmu keysafe_0.4.0.2-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild with libbotan1.8-dev (>= >> >> 1.8.13-2) to fix SONAME breakage in libbotan-1.8.2 (= 1.8.13-1)" >> > >> > Aside from the fact that the package name was originally not changed to >> > follow the SONAME bump, now that things have been fixed up this is >> > "just" an un-coordinated library transition afaics? >> >> Yes, it is, but I have filled a transition bug some time ago: >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638818 > > Our definitions of "some time ago" differ somewhat, it would appear. :-) > (and the bug is intended to be filed in advance of the upload, to allow > us to co-ordinate, rather than afterwards).
I know and I am sorry, but that SONAME change went unnoticed on my side somehow and after that it was too late to let you know _before_ the transition. > In any case, yes, I missed that when replying, sorry. > >> > If so, was there any reason that binNMUs for monotone weren't also >> > requested? >> >> Because I was just writing the monotone maintainers and I didn't want >> to step on their toes: >> >> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=640638#12 > > You might want to fix up the version information on that bug - because > of the merging, it's currently marked as found in both -1 and -4, but > fixed in -2, which means the BTS thinks it's still relevant in unstable. Will do, thanks. > I've scheduled the binNMUs for keysafe and monotone, as they don't > obviously appear to be involved in other ongoing transitions. Thank you. O. -- Ondřej Surý <ond...@sury.org> http://blog.rfc1925.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org