On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 07:10 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 07:40:39PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 16:31 +0200, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > would you consider the attached patches for a squeeze point release for > > > eglibc? > > > > > > The reason behind this request is: on systems with a lot of mounts, > > > statvfs64() libc function takes a huge amount of times since it needs > > > to parse /proc/mounts. With the proposed patches, and with a kernel > > > from bpo (it's needed >= 2.6.36 where there's a syscall to get what > > > libc needs) we can fix this behavior. > > > > Aurelien - are these patches already included in the proposed eglibc > > 2.11.4? > > > No, they are not. I am waiting for your opinion before adding them to > our stable branch.
Unfortunately we don't appear to have settled on a final opinion yet. Due to the closeness of the p-u-NEW freeze we've decided to not include these changes in 6.0.3 and revisit them shortly afterwards when we look at the eglibc stable changes again. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
