Hi, On Wed, 05 Oct 2011, Nikolaus Rath wrote: > Yeah, I agree. But I'm trying to make a more general point: what's wrong > with an arch: all package having arch-dependend deps? Why isn't that > allowed?
Because this feature is not implemented in dpkg... it's not a matter of allowed or not, it's a matter that dpkg doesn't grok arch-specific dependencies in the control file. Cheers, -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Pre-order a copy of the Debian Administrator's Handbook and help liberate it: http://debian-handbook.info/go/ulule-rh/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
