On 18/10/2011 11:20, Hector Oron wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 04:03:37PM +0200, Jérémy Lal wrote: >> On 03/10/2011 15:48, Julian Andres Klode wrote: >>> Version: 3.4.14.21-3 >>> libv8 currently fails to build from source on armel due to failing tests. >> >> Hi, >> i'm well aware of the situation. >> It has improved a bit : armel 3.4.14.21-3 actually /run/ tests. > > Indeed, a rebuild has happened, just in case you want to cross check with > previous build: > > <https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=libv8&arch=armel&ver=3.4.14.21-3&stamp=1318916897>
I receive those reports, but thank you for your support. >> I have no clue yet as why those tests fail. Things to be verified : >> * run the tests using d8, not shell, as it is deprecated >> * build v8 using gyp instead of scons, deprecated too (i am working on it) >> * update to latest 3.4 revision >> * check other options : crankshaft, snapshot. They might need to be >> toggled to allow armel support. >> >> In any case, i'd be more productive with an actual armel shell. > > May I suggest you to apply for a Debian guest account on abel.debian.org: > <http://dsa.debian.org/doc/guest-account/> I sent that (signed) request on 29/08/2011 00:32, i guess it has been ignored : > Hi, > here's my request to get an access to armel porter machine(s) : > > First/last name Jérémy Lal > Preferred username kapouer (i may already have kapouer-guest registered > for anonscm.d.o access) > GPG fingerprint 074141DC > email address kapo...@melix.org > DMUP signed agreement > http://lists.debian.org/debian-newmaint/2010/04/msg00018.html > Machines/Architectures abel, agricola for armel arch > Rationale libv8 and nodejs FTBFS often with unreproducible bugs > under qemu. > having access to real armel hardware would help a lot > (i'm the > leading maintainer of these packages). > > Regards, > Jérémy. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org