On Tue, 18 Oct 2011 10:36:13 +0300 Eugene V. Lyubimkin wrote: [...] > On 2011-10-17 23:36, Francesco Poli wrote: [...] > > Assuming that this is true and confirmed, is the modification of > > apt-listbugs (so that it uses -30000 instead of -40 as Pin-Priority to > > prevent the installation of a package) still useful? > > As for me -- yes.
Good, I've just pushed this modification to the apt-listbugs public git repository: see http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=apt-listbugs/apt-listbugs.git;a=commitdiff;h=c7561047b211039c5d12e0006fd3af7a16d98ea6 You may therefore consider this modification as "pending" (that is to say, it will be present in the next upload). As far as the rest of message http://bugs.debian.org/645412#32 is concerned, I still have to read it fully and think about your proposal. I hope I manage to find the time soon... ;-) -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpymgyzLYFAH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
