Package: libcwiid1 Version: 0.6.00+svn201-2+b2 Severity: wishlist
Dear debian developpers, Should Debian really keep on using the svn of cwiid as upstream? The developement of cwiid is mainly done on github[1] these days according to the main devleopper[2]. Actually, the bug reported in [3] is already fixed upstream by commit [4]. [1] https://github.com/abstrakraft/cwiid [2] http://abstrakraft.org/cwiid/wiki [3] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636691 [4] https://github.com/abstrakraft/cwiid/commit/b54bd057fe6b258d6e0a99047f839891ab3bc2df -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.2 APT prefers stable APT policy: (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Versions of packages libcwiid1 depends on: ii libbluetooth3 4.66-3 Library to use the BlueZ Linux Blu ii libc6 2.11.2-10 Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib libcwiid1 recommends no packages. libcwiid1 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
