On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 01:48:53PM +0200, Mario 'BitKoenig' Holbe wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 04:32:56PM +0200, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > On Tue, 2011-05-24 at 15:45 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > > On 05/04/2011 16:48, Julian Andres Klode wrote: > > > > As I wrote some time ago, the APT team would like to disable > > > > the old python-apt API for Python 2.X now. > > > Are you ready to start this transition? If so, please go ahead. > > 0.8.0 uploaded to unstable. Increasing the other bug severities to > > release critical (grave, as they are uninstallable and thus unusable > > is there some progress to expect on computer-janitor wrt. python-apt > transition or should I simply remove the package? > > I just don't get it: the maintainer himself files a bug for his own > package, raises its severity later and nothing appears to happen on it > for more than a year.
It was a somewhat busy time, doing lots of different things. There are updates pending for most of my packages, but I need to find the right time to do them, as some are somewhat complex. In case of computer-janitor, there also has not been any upstream release tarball since 2.1 in February, so I'm not sure whether there is any active development there either. It has not been ported in Ubuntu either. I don't know what Canonical intents to do with this program, I won't port it myself at the moment. You're free to provide a patch to make computer-janitor 2.1.0-0ubuntu6 run on Debian, though, and get that upstream, and then I'll happily upload a new version for you. Until that's fixed upstream, my time is allocated to packages that are already in stable and shall remain there; not to packages that are only in unstable. -- Julian Andres Klode - Debian Developer, Ubuntu Member See http://wiki.debian.org/JulianAndresKlode and http://jak-linux.org/. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
