Package: imageshack-uploader
Version: 2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428-2
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
I may be wrong about it, but in my opinion, there was no reason to
separate imageshack-uploader-common package from imageshack-uploader.
The latter depends on the former, and I seriously doubt that anyone
would want imageshack-uploader-common without imageshack-uploader. I
suggest to merge these packages into one.
Again, I may be wrong, so feel free to close it as invalid if I am wrong.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.0.0-1-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=lt_LT.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=lt_LT.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages imageshack-uploader depends on:
ii imageshack-uploader-common 2.2+hg20100408.d802dea89428-2
ii libavcodec52 4:0.6.2-5 ii
libavformat52 4:0.6.2-5 ii libavutil50
4:0.6.2-5 ii libc6
2.13-21 ii libgcc1
1:4.6.1-15 ii libqt4-network 4:4.7.3-5
ii libqt4-xml 4:4.7.3-5
ii libqtcore4 4:4.7.3-5 ii
libqtgui4 4:4.7.3-5 ii libstdc++6
4.6.1-15 ii libswscale0
4:0.6.2-5
imageshack-uploader recommends no packages.
imageshack-uploader suggests no packages.
-- no debconf information
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
