On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Jonathan Nieder <jrnie...@gmail.com> wrote: > Justin B Rye wrote:
>> I was wondering about s/invoke-rc.d/service/, on the grounds that the >> former may be required by policy for packages but the latter is >> friendlier for sysadmins, but I doubt there would be a consensus. > > FWIW, I think it would be unquestionably a good change. invoke-rc.d > was never meant for direct use by sysadmins in typical cases (and it > has some funny features like doing nothing when policy-rc.d says so). > But of course this is up to the guacamole maintainer. Michael, what > do you think? > I greatly prefer "service" over "invoke-rc.d" in the instructions. I only used "invoke-rc.d" as that's the way the postinst script does things, as specified in the packaging standards. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
