Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
[ re-filing as a bug per jcristau ]
We'd like to start the Mono transition[0,0.5] soon.
The packages have been aged in experimental for some time now, and this
transition has also taken place in Another Place with no notable
badness.
Following the RT's request for a dry run (Model 3 in [0.5]), Julian
Taylor did a test rebuild[1] of all rdepends and to the best of our
knowledge we have resolved the outstanding issues so that all that
should be required are no-change rebuilds or uploads from experimental
to unstable, as well as one removal of a package not yet ported
(dlr-languages).
Roughly, the plan will be
* Upload all of mono & cli-common from experimental to unstable
* Upload build tools (nant)
* Remove mono-debugger
* Get LO bindings disabled
* No-change rebuild / binNMU all applications against the 4.0
profile
* No-change rebuild / binNMU all libraries against the 4.0 profile, in
leaf-first order
The reason for this ordering is because 4.0 executables can load 2.0
libraries but not vice-versa. A great deal of packages are pure managed
code, so arch:all and will therefore require sourceful uploads.
You can see the results of our testing at [2].
Please let us know when we can go ahead.
Cheers,
on behalf of the Debian Mono Group,
--
Iain Lane [ i...@orangesquash.org.uk ]
Debian Developer [ la...@debian.org ]
Ubuntu Developer [ la...@ubuntu.com ]
PhD student [ i...@cs.nott.ac.uk ]
[0] http://release.debian.org/transitions/html/mono.html
[0.5] http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianMonoGroup/Mono210Transition
[1] http://alioth.debian.org/~jtaylor-guest/logs/
[2] http://wiki.debian.org/Teams/DebianMonoGroup/Mono210TransitionTODO
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
