Le jeudi, 17 novembre 2011 10.22:51, Ludovic Brenta a écrit : > Didier Raboud wrote: > > two months later, what is the status of this transition ? > > Not started yet, I've been working on other packages. Your mail > prompted me to send a full status report to debian-ada@l.d.o, see > http://lists.debian.org/debian-ada/2011/11/msg00002.html
Great. > > Are the packages going to be migrated to "unversionned" gnat versions > > or > > should NMUers go to "versionned" gnat-4.6 ? > > Per Debian Policy for Ada, all Ada source packages must build-depend on > both gnat gnat gnat-4.6. The reasons are explained in there: > > http://people.debian.org/~lbrenta/debian-ada-policy.html Why on both? This seems to just make transitions more painful (to you)… Why not at least alternatives (aka B-D: gnat-4.6 | gnat ), or simply "not- versioned" (aka B-D: gnat). Any Debian suite has one available gnat at any given time (per the above policy), no ? The same goes for binary packages depends. Anyway; I don't intend to stand in your path; I was mostly interested in getting those RC bugs fixed. As long as they get fixed before the freeze (or the given packages removed from testing), I'm fine. :-> Cheers, -- OdyX
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
