Hi, Apologies for the delayed response; I've been away from Internet access for a bit.
On Nov 24, 2011 7:49 AM, "Rene Engelhard" <rene.engelh...@gmx.de> wrote: > > You don't need ant *and* ant-optional? Sorry, I can't believe that, I think you need ant either way, so ... > Unless I'm misinterpreting ant-optional's dep(s), it already covers ant. Is that insufficient for this usage? Regardless, you've already uploaded a fixed source package that can be synced to Ubuntu, so thanks a lot for your consideration! Cheers, -Dan