Package: ocrodjvu Version: 0.7.6-1 Severity: minor Tags: l10n Dear Maintainer,
the package description is not proper english: "to higher" the accessibility of something (last paragraph) is wrong, should be "to improve". "especially suited for the archival of books with high quality" is ambiguous (is it suited for good books, or for good archival?), maybe "especially suited for the high quality archival of books". I am not a native english speaker myself, just stumbled across these two and got confirmation on IRC for these. Maybe the description should be checked by a native speaker. Thanks for your work Michael -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'stable'), (10, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Versions of packages ocrodjvu depends on: ii djvulibre-bin 3.5.24-9 ii python 2.7.2-9 ii python-argparse 1.2.1-1 ii python-djvu 0.3.3-1 Versions of packages ocrodjvu recommends: ii ocropus 0.3.1-3+b2 ii python-lxml 2.3-0.1+b2 ii python-pyicu 1.3-1 ii tesseract-ocr 2.04-2.1+b1 Versions of packages ocrodjvu suggests: ii cuneiform 1.1.0+dfsg-2 ii gocr 0.48-1 ii ocrad 0.21-3 -- no debconf information -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
