tags 633047 + patch
thanks

On Fri, Jul 08, 2011 at 12:07:13AM +0100, Roger Leigh wrote:
> Source: chkrootkit
> Version: 0.49-4
> Severity: important
> User: rle...@debian.org
> Usertags: run-transition
> 
> Your package is currently using /lib/init/rw/ which is now deprecated
> and pending removal.  Please update your package to use /run/ with a
> versioned dependency on initscripts, as detailed below.

Patch attached.


Regards,
Roger

-- 
  .''`.  Roger Leigh
 : :' :  Debian GNU/Linux             http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/
 `. `'   Printing on GNU/Linux?       http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/
   `-    GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848   Please GPG sign your mail.
>From 1f7fb2dc501af64c44de4632d2fc0f558b739691 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Roger Leigh <Roger Leigh rle...@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:31:21 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] debian: Replace use of /lib/init/rw with /run and close
 #633047

---
 debian/changelog              |    8 ++++++++
 debian/patches/excludes.patch |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index f094bff..e4d6779 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+chkrootkit (0.49-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * /run transition: Replace use of /lib/init/rw with /run in
+    debian/patches/excludes.patch. (Closes: #633047)
+
+ -- Roger Leigh <rle...@debian.org>  Wed, 07 Dec 2011 09:29:56 +0000
+
 chkrootkit (0.49-4) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * [4cb2e6c] Removed unused patches
diff --git a/debian/patches/excludes.patch b/debian/patches/excludes.patch
index 170ba41..5c5c33b 100644
--- a/debian/patches/excludes.patch
+++ b/debian/patches/excludes.patch
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Description: add the ability to exclude specific files/directories from the chec
 + Because the above would result in less security, there is support for
 + excluding files, using the -e flag, for example:
 +
-+   # ./chkrootkit -e '/lib/init/rw/.mdadm /lib/init/rw/.ramfs'
++   # ./chkrootkit -e '/run/.ramfs'
 +
 + WARNING: by using this option you are giving attackers a way to avoid
 + detection! Make absolutely sure that these are truly false positives
-- 
1.7.7.3

Reply via email to