On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:02:18 -0500 Adam C Powell IV wrote: [...] > Or do you agree with Francesco's analysis based on the preamble, which > is not legally binding?
My GPL-compatibility analysis is not based on the preamble: where did you get the impression that it was? As I said in the original bug report [1]: | it implements a copyleft mechanism and has no explicit | GPL-compatibility clause. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/617613#5 I tried to be more explicit in my previous message [2] [2] http://bugs.debian.org/617613#99 -- http://www.inventati.org/frx/frx-gpg-key-transition-2010.txt New GnuPG key, see the transition document! ..................................................... Francesco Poli . GnuPG key fpr == CA01 1147 9CD2 EFDF FB82 3925 3E1C 27E1 1F69 BFFE
pgpepxbNGgY4N.pgp
Description: PGP signature
