Package: opendkim
Version: 2.1.3+dfsg-1+b1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
* What outcome did you expect instead?
*** End of the template - remove these lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: wheezy/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 3.1.0-1-486
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Versions of packages opendkim depends on:
ii adduser 3.113
ii libc6 2.13-21
ii libdb5.1 5.1.25-11
ii libldap-2.4-2 2.4.25-4+b1
ii liblua5.1-0 5.1.4-10
ii libmilter1.0.1 8.14.4-2+b1
ii libopendkim2 2.1.3+dfsg-1+b1
ii libssl1.0.0 1.0.0e-3
ii libunbound2 1.4.13-2
opendkim recommends no packages.
opendkim suggests no packages.
-- Configuration Files:
/etc/opendkim.conf changed:
UMask 002
Socket /var/spool/postfix/smtpd_milters/opendkim.sock
ADSPDiscard yes
ADSPNoSuchDomain yes
SendADSPReports yes
SendReports yes
Syslog yes
LogWhy yes
SyslogSuccess yes
LocalADSP file:/etc/opendkim/LocalADSP
AlwaysAddARHeader yes
KeyTable file:/etc/opendkim/KeyTable
SigningTable refile:/etc/opendkim/SigningTable
-- no debconf information
I've exposed my problem to the opendkim ML:
> This is what I added to opendkim.conf
> | AlwaysAddARHeader yes
> | LocalADSP file:/etc/opendkim/LocalADSP
>
> | cat /etc/opendkim/LocalADSP
> | yahoo.com discardable
> |
>
> Then I reloaded/restarted opendkim (tried both), and sent an email
> without any DKIM signature (via telnet on my smtpd). but here is what I
> received:
>
> | Return-Path: <tes...@yahoo.com>
> | X-Original-To: samt...@sltosis.org
>
>
> | Delivered-To: samt...@sltosis.org
> | Received-SPF: none (yahoo.com: No applicable sender policy available)
> receiver=mx.sltosis.org; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="tes...@yahoo.com";
> helo=mail.yop.fr; client-ip=82.91.3.164
> | Authentication-Results: mx.sltosis.org; dkim=none (no signature);
> | dkim-adsp=none (insecure policy)
>
>
> | Received: from mail.yop.fr (mail.yop.fr [82.91.3.164])
> | by mx.sltosis.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB801FFBA
>
>
> | for <samt...@sltosis.org>; Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:57:16 +0100 (CET)
> | from: tes...@yahoo.com
>
>
> | to: samt...@sltosis.org
> | subject: ...
>
>
> |
> | blah
>
>
> | no
> |
>
>
>
>
> I don't understand the result, how come the "dkim-adsp=none"? Should not
> the message get rejected or something?
Which gave me these two replies:
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 09:09:49AM -0800, Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
> >> What version of OpenDKIM are you running?
> > | opendkim -V
> > | opendkim: OpenDKIM Filter v2.1.3
> LocalADSP was broken up to v2.2.0. I suggest trying an upgrade. The current
> version is v2.4.2, with v2.5.0 now in Beta.
>
>
>
>
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:57:22AM -0800, Todd Lyons wrote:
> Can you repeat your test with a current version of opendkim (2.4.2 is
>
>
> latest release version)? To my knowledge the ADSP code was functional
>
>
> back then though (last code change to adsp was 1 year 3 months ago,
>
>
> which is about the time your version was released).
>
>
I don't see any new version of opendkim in the DBTS, and the current one in the
debian repo is quite old. From the Changelog(which I won't paste here unless
asked), there has been a lot of bugfix since 2.1.3.
Would it be possible to consider upgrading this package?
Thank you
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
