tags 653068 + moreinfo unreproducible thanks On 23.12.2011 18:48, Matthias Heinz wrote: > Hi, > > Am 23.12.2011 14:54, schrieb Michael Tokarev: >> Hmm. Does #586143 , for example, ring any bells? > > I read that one and thought about it. But I don't know if > it applies. Sometimes the message states that it's already > the initrd that gets loaded, before it fails. > > And it is reproducible, means I can't just reboot and try > again and it will work somehow.
You mean it is NOT reproducible, right? Is the address it complains about always the same? [] >>> Then the VM uses 100% of the cpu resources. >>> This happens with the netinstall cds and it doesn't matter >>> wether I use the i386 or amd64 netinstall ISO. >> >> Which version of squeeze, exactly, you tried to install? You didn't answer this question. I tested current 6.0.3 netinst images (both amd64 and i686), and in both cases installation wents ok and the resulting image boots just fine. I tried in both qemu-kvm 1.0 (currently in unstable) and qemu-kvm 0.15 (in testing) - the same result. But I didn't try "hard enough" - doing just 2 reboots after install completes. So please provide more information about your environment, including qemu-kvm command line, actual version of squeeze you tried to install. >>> Kernel: Linux 2.6.39-bpo.2-686-pae (SMP w/2 CPU cores) >> >> Does the same happens on 64bit system (if you can verify)? > > Sorry, I forgot to mention that. I wrote the report from my > computer, not from the system I tested this on. > > It's running linux-image-3.1.0-1-amd64, so it's the wheezy > kernel and 64bit :) Ok. > If this is a grub bug, I could try to build grub from testing > for squeeze, boot with a live CD manually the VM and install > it there, if it helps to figure out what's wrong. That'd be really helpful. Besides, did these images work with earlier versions of qemu-kvm? Does anything change when you try 1.0 version? > Or is there some kind of debug mode for grub that prints to > serio I could use to get more informations out of the VM? Not that I know of. Thanks, /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
