forcemerge 654845 315570 thanks Le mercredi 11 janvier 2012 à 15:53 +0100, roucaries bastien a écrit : > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Sylvestre Ledru <sylves...@debian.org> > wrote: > > Le vendredi 06 janvier 2012 à 01:51 -0500, Viral B. Shah a écrit : > >> Package: libarpack2 > >> Severity: important > >> > >> > >> ARPACK needs to use LAPACK 2.0 for correctness. This will cause a > >> conflict with liblapack upon which it depends. See this thread on the > >> issue and a name mangling fix, so that LAPACK 2.0 routines can be used > >> in ARPACK. > > I don't see the issue for now. > > Could you produce a sample which shows the issue ? > > Solved long time ago: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=315570 > > Sylvain feel free to force-merge if I have understood correctly OK.
Thanks for the information Sylvestre (and not Sylvain ;) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org