ok -- few more points
* is it really necessary to depend on +dfsg'ed version of sphinx? i.e.
python-sphinx (>= 1.0.7+dfsg)
unless strictly needed, I would appreciate if it becomes
python-sphinx (>= 1.0.7~)
asking because in NeuroDebian we still carry backport of 1.0.7-2 ;)
* upstream provides a mighty unittest battery. minimalistic/default
version ran in 280 sec on my box, so imho acceptable and desired to be
enabled to be ran during package build time. I have ran it simply
through
PYTHONPATH=$PWD/.. python -c 'import tables; tables.test()
from build directory after building extensions in place. Ideally it
should imho be ran against version "installed" under debian/.
I enable testing for all of my packages where there are tests
batteries and it has been proven indispensable especially for reliable
backporting
* debhelper 8 -- may be I have missed some news (I am somewhat
non-compliant myself and using 7 for the sake of easy backports for
elderly releases), but why (>= 8.1.0) and not just (>= 8) (squeeze
carries 8.0.0)
Cheers,
On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> first of all -- thanks for all the work!!!
> My quick take would be:
> * I would have added debian/README.source to describe that .orig
> fetched from GIT tarball directly so would not match upstream's
> source distribution tarball
> *
> -Maintainer: Wen Heping <wenhep...@gmail.com>
> +Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers
> <debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org>
> +Uploaders: Wen Heping <wenhep...@gmail.com>, Antonio Valentino
> <antonio.valent...@tiscali.it>
> +DM-Upload-Allowed: yes
> I think
> - premature for DM-Upload-Allowed (nothing personal but at least I
> would not sponsor upload then, since I am not very familiar with
> Antonio's work (yet))
> - I would drop Wen altogether
> * building it now so might whine a bit more later on ;-)
> Thanks once again!
> On Tue, 17 Jan 2012, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > Hi guys -- sorry, this email slipped through my eyes ;)
> > > PS: Yaroslave can you read all the thread 641485 and gives you opinion.
> > if you meant
> > - should we get a new version -- SURE
> > - should we wait longer for original maintainer to reply -- NO
> > his uploads were sponsored and he was inactive for way to long to
> > indicate that he cares at all
> > - maintaining under debian-science team umbrella -- SURE
> > on my side -- I will have a look at package either it is easily
> > backportable
--
=------------------------------------------------------------------=
Keep in touch www.onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
