* Nathanael Nerode ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Rather than messing around with making it undergo the g++-4.0 transition, > dealing with all its bugs, etc., I suggest removing it from Debian, replacing > it with a dummy package depending on gabber2 (or vice versa, but either way > leaving only one gabber package). Is gabber2 stable enough to do this yet? > Is there some reason not to?
I would really like to be able to do this right now. But as it is now, gabber 2 still can't replace gabber 1. Gabber 2 is not stable enough for a release and still lack many features from Gabber 1. I'm currently working o stabilizing the current code base in order to start adding the missing features. Until we finish this task, we'll have to continue having two versions of gabber in the archive. -- .''`. Goedson Teixeira Paixao <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : http://people.debian.org/~goedson/ `. `' Jabber ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] `-
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
