I've now come to the conclusion that this is in fact actually not an RC
bug, none of the criteria listed on
http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities for severity grave
apply.  The original setting of "important" turns out to have been spot on.

The current package is installable just fine.  While no doubt resulting
in a bit of an ugly state, the update from one particular unstable
package to another breaks but also works at least to the point of not
leaving the package unusable and according to Paul there is also an easy
workaround to resolve the situation.  Nothing qualifying for grave
severity that I can see.

I find it highly irritating that nobody wanted to properly maintain this
package for years and now that I've taken on this difficult task of
cleaning up this year-long neglect everybody and their uncle thinks they
know better how to do that.  And in all honesty, this may very well be
the case (I certainly make many mistakes along the way) but the fact
remains nobody else stepped up to the plate when it was necessary.  I
take cleaning up the package and maintaining a high quality seriously
and would appreciate if those who never cared about it to not constantly
making my life more difficult than it needs to be.

This bug never affected testing, it's in fact not an RC bug even for
unstable itself.  Anybody who blocks the current package from going to
testing is not doing Debian a favour.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to