Thibaut VARENE wrote:
Thanks for your effort.
Let us know how the upstream integration is going on.
If you have a chance, you might want to take a look at the bugs listed
here[0], and see if your rewrite fixes any of them (other than the
ones you have already commented on).
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=pidgin-otr
Aside from the ones I've already commented on, no, my work doesn't affect any
of these other bugs.
Just for reference, the upstream bug report has been re-opened since I started
working on the issue:
http://developer.pidgin.im/ticket/11623
3 out of 4 of my patches have already been integrated into pidgin upstream,
and I expect the last will be merged soon.
I haven't yet gotten any more feedback from the OTR upstream. Interestingly
enough, I see that ArchLinux is already distributing my new plugin code.
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pu/purple-otr/
I would have preferred that my code be merged into the OTR Project's code
first; I didn't mean to fork their stuff permanently.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 12:40 PM, Howard Chu<h...@highlandsun.com> wrote:
I've rewritten the pidgin-otr-3.2.0 plugin to use the libpurple API, so a
single plugin works for both pidgin and finch. Details are here
http://lists.cypherpunks.ca/pipermail/otr-dev/2011-December/001237.html
and the source code is here
https://gitorious.org/purple-otr
I expect that with some user and developer feedback we'll find a way forward
to bring this support into the official OTR sources down the road.
I use this with pidgin/finch 2.10.1 with 4 additional patches, as detailed
in the links above.
--
-- Howard Chu
CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com
Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/
Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
