On 01/28/2012 10:32 PM, Cyril Lavier wrote:
On 01/28/2012 07:51 PM, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
On Sa, Jan 28, 2012 at 18:41:06 (CET), Cyril Lavier wrote:


[...]

Hi.

I didn't choose anything, I just took the patch which Andrei did, just
rewrote it and applied it to the sources. But I agree with your comment,
as I don't know why he chose those particular version.
I see. Can you ask him to clarify? I guess that clarification is best
documented by a source-code comment.

I just asked him, let's wait until he answers.
I will work on reducing these requirements for easing the making of a
squeeze-backport (as I'm the backporter, I won't have to work twice on
the patch).
Since libav 0.7 (and soon 0.8) is available in squeeze-backports, I
wouldn't spend too much time on that. Just build against libav in
squeeze-backports and be done with that.
You are right.

I just made a quick build of audacious and audacious-plugins on a squeeze-backports pbuilder, and the only issues I had are with others libs (libbs2b-dev for audacious-plugins, libguess-dev and libuchardet-dev for audacious which are not available in stable). The build went well.

I just tested the packages on a Squeeze laptop, and he plays wma files like a charm, so it confirms the well done build :).

I completely understand that upgrading the needed libs is quite risky
and won't be done in the next days/weeks without risking to break a lot
of packages.
What libraries would require updates? Currently, we do ship up-to-date
packages.
Sorry, I completely messed this paragraph, I was writing 2 mails at the
same time and my colleagues might think I'm crazy now, after talking
about audacious in a corporate mail about an off-hours product update
which turned bad :/.
no problem :-)

So I would like to know what do you think about this patch, if this can be a good solution, and then I will perform the needed changes and push
it to the git repo or if you think it's not a good solution, we won't
have the plugin working for now.
The configure part can be dropped if you run the autofoo toolchain on
the buildds (cf. dh-autoreconf or similar).
Thanks for this idea.
The ffaudio-core part looks reasonable to me on the first sight. It
could probably simplified a bit by requiring libav{codec,format}>= 53

Cheers,
Reinhard

Thanks for this quick review.

I will focus on making this patch working for debian squeeze and more
testing with this patch activated.
see above wrt squeeze-backports.

Cheers,
Reinhard

Thanks.

Hi Reinhard.

I got the answer right here : http://redmine.audacious-media-player.org/boards/1/topics/89?r=121#message-121

So apparently, the versions choosed were the last specified before they increased version requirements.

Also, John Lindgren explains why the libavcodec 52.64.0 is required (an API change in FFMPEG).

Sorry for the late answer, I had a busy week working on nginx packaging (fixing the last goals for the wheezy freeze, and starting to make people work as a team).

Thanks.

--
Cyril "Davromaniak" Lavier
KeyID 59E9A881
http://www.davromaniak.eu




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org

Reply via email to