Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Perhaps the ppc64 detection is broken, and so something wrong is > > The ppc64 detection is not broken. It has been tested by the > ppc64 porters. It sounded to me like Thomas was just suggesting that the ppc64 patch might be causing configure to accidentally return a false positive on ppc32 machines, not that it was doing anything wrong on ppc64 machines, or is that how you read him too? In any case, it seems like trying to build on a ppc32 host with the ppc64 patch temporarily omitted will at least let us know if that alleviates the segfault. -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
