-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Le 17/02/2012 21:44, Aaron M. Ucko a écrit : > xavier grave <xavier.gr...@ipno.in2p3.fr> writes: > >> Thanks you for reporting this bug, I have build this package with >> pbuilder. Can you give me pointers to the minimal environment building >> only architecture-dependent binary packages please ? I'm not familiar >> with the autobuilders. > > The autobuilders run sbuild, but pbuilder also supports just building > (and installing build dependencies for) architecture-dependent packages: > > pdebuild -- --binary-arch > > pbuilder --build --binary-arch liblog4ada_*.dsc > > Thanks for checking!
Here are my checks : I reproduce the problem with : debuild -- --binary-arch under a sid environment (without pdflatex from texlive-latex-base ): a fakeroot debian/rules binary-arch builds fine and a fakeroot debian/rules binary-indep fails without the texlive-latex-base package. My package seems to follow Debian policy [1], and pdflatex is only called when building -doc package. May be I'm wrong on this point ? The problem seems very related to bug #521918 to me. Do you think I should open a bug against pdebuild ? Quite strange the bug #452567 seems to be the exact opposite of the problem my package have. Since texlive-latex-base and texlive suite is a quite big suite to install I'd like your advice before doing any packaging modification that can lead in a longer build as in #452567 (merging Build-Depends-Indep in Build-Depends). Thanks again for your quick answer to my pdebuild related question. xavier [1] http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#s-sourcebinarydeps -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPQjCSAAoJEG3iFwasTcfaMVYQALwL54zZggLPWRrCdkUDWyeW QeeTDgmdnc7YZE7EMsv0RjZkfKOVr2ALoByKdNu49Za0rWFdbEOcwUu/HsiWjDX4 w4ODPWvgYKb7PmTWxvJ8ALRmR37FJjMlLqIBXzXotnlNta0w4bB+2aRsbP7FtSk7 uMVulGoc22C6Razh65tg6kZPMmgNgU9SRviETiNJZAs89nu3w6dgOROqDJET7uId 7hn9S/AGUId2DxCZnqAbkqfn4NX5a3Ay+Oqud1ZJdP6273EeTtHEluxRS8QUoqL4 buiIqTvn6RdU8sbL4+DwARXfS3rRr/+ltUoidXj1QaABXTnt/QSCGCEvbK1jWQNe Q7WidPkhteyfYPbYPgDtpi9225Op2NywuRvv0Xed9osr3Ff7znrN8AKNfh6YdqQ6 zo2cQUPChqnyvt05mm+U/gqvNSQuxbNuOgTyEqhLyk0SJL4MSQVL7tU7NrFcmD61 Z4Vao2il2kitTfYig1ZxIpjLqzGnysFtmqjfJMNtjdJ1KayACh3hEVAEi7ZE0bsx NJm0EuJSMY+81GxlnbmOS/ANtxsg95PE1BSR7tZxEkZYdun//puY5VrygHP9OGiK PMrbk912xFDDNv9OmYF8nzGbMjGu/1K7laHk9eW+9QIYxEMotR0zlXrQ5vaDRkzl yP0iTIy5rh/3lEuz59Pq =rjKe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
