Niels Thykier <ni...@thykier.net> writes: > I believe Britney already handles this reasonably[1]. Of course, I > assume here that by "ignore" you mean it is (also) okay for Britney not > to include them in the resulting HeidiResult file.
That is fine. > Assuming there will be a source package in Sources only kept due to > Built-Using, then Britney may (or may not) keep its counterpart in > testing until the source package disappears from Sources (in sid). If > it does not have any binaries and it is not in testing, then she will at > least keep it out of testing[2]. dak would also include them in Sources for testing, britney could not remove them as they are handled differently in dak. Would britney handle that as well? For reference here are the sources that would currently be included in Sources right now: WITH extra_sources AS (SELECT DISTINCT es.src_id FROM extra_src_references es JOIN bin_associations ba ON es.bin_id = ba.bin WHERE ba.suite = 4 EXCEPT SELECT source FROM src_associations WHERE suite = 4) SELECT source, version FROM source WHERE id IN (SELECT * FROM extra_sources); For testing (suite=4): gcc-4.6 | 4.6.2-6 binutils | 2.22-2 gcc-4.6 | 4.6.2-1 gcc-4.6 | 4.6.1-16 binutils | 2.22-1 gcc-4.6 | 4.6.2-5 For unstable (suite=5): gdb | 7.3-1 gcc-4.6 | 4.6.0-9 gcc-4.6 | 4.6.2-14 binutils | 2.22-1 Regards, Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org