On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 06:20:40PM +0100, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Niko and Dominic > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 06:26:07PM +0200, Niko Tyni wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 02:18:16PM +0000, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > > > > In general I agree, but there's a mistake in the perl package too: > > > libshell-perl shouldn't be broken by perl as it's been deprecated. > > > > I don't think that's a bug in the perl package: the libshell-perl package > > is lagging behind in Debian as it's at 0.72 while CPAN and core have > > Shell 0.72_01. > > > > There's actually a meaningful doc fix in 0.72_01, see > > http://search.cpan.org/diff?from=Shell-0.72&to=Shell-0.72_01&w=1 > > so Breaks: libshell-perl (<< 0.72.01) seems to be correct and ensures > > that the "buggy" 0.72 never overrides the "fixed" 0.72_01. > > > > The best solution AFAICS would be to upgrade the Debian > > package and keep the Breaks entry.
Yes. Thanks for checking this and apologies for the oversight. I've reinstated the Breaks. > Okay, just reading your message, and I have updated the package in the > Debian Perl Group repo [1]. > > Please let me know if we should upload it. Please do; thanks! -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org