On 03/03/2012 09:47 PM, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > Hi Antonio and Julian, > > Sorry for being silent/disconnected > > so -- what is the status -- should we meanwhile upload to see how things > are "going" across platforms? or should we may be adopt blosc > disabling patches from Julian first.... > sparc issue is still not resolved AFAIK > > I have pushed a tiny fix for typos with a close statement for 661287 > (CCed now) (if I got it right on what we are closing now ;) ) >
you will have to disable blosc if you want it to build on all arches, I did not look into fixing blosc as its more complicated and its probably performance critical code where adding slow hacks to remove unaligned accesses will likely break the whole benefit of it. This will have to be done upstream. I built the ubuntu package on a sparc64 and it succeeded, from the logs it looks like the same issue as arm's (unaligned memory access). What makes you think it won't work?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
