On 12-03-04 at 06:08pm, Sergio Cipolla wrote: > Fabian, who do you think you are to call d-m-o's packages as 'crappy'? > d-m-o is a traditional and very respected 3rd party repository for > Debian and has been for years. > I can't tell the same of you.
You are correct, Sergio: Debian never was as good a 3rd party repository for Debian as d-m-o. > You know very well why it uses an epoch in their versioning: exactly > so as people that want/need to use the extra features/packages it > provides don't mix what shouldn't be mixed with the official Debian > packages. Excellent. But wait: ISn't this a bugreport? Against Debian?!? Seems to me that somewhere in all its excellence, d-m-o failed to separate and distinguish itself properly from Debian and broke something. Or if d-m-o did not break but Debian did, then why on Earth use Debian - d-m-o is apparently much better _without_ Debian, no? - Jonas One of those silly ones devoted to the boring Debian itself. -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature