On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 09:12:44PM +0100, Santiago Garcia Mantinan wrote: > Hi! Hi,
thanks for your bugreport. > I was revising other servers and found severl others having the same issue, > this one is a bit extrange as the upgrade that took place is the same as the > one on the i686 server I reported a bit earlier, the differences are: > > 1- on time, this server due to mirrors timings did the upgrade on the 29th > while my previous reported stable server had done the upgrade on the 30th > > 2- on sizes, as this new server has more things installed (like X server) > > 3- on the result, on this server the process holding things was not samba, > even though it also has samba and it was upgraded, this time is hald, while > hal was not upgraded [..] > Looks like some of the packages made hal triggers get processed and thus > hald got restarted inheriting every fd. Indeed, I uploaded a new version of unattended-upgrades into unstable now that fixes the fd leak and that should fix this problem as well, please keep me updated if the problem vanishes or reappears. Cheers, Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
