On ven., 2012-03-09 at 18:38 +0530, shirish शिरीष wrote: > at bottom :- >
> Thank you for sharing that, I guess the best way would be to remove > midori then from a user perspective? Well, midori 0.4.3 does work fine. > > I ask because any changes you would have to make to the package would > involve using this 'waf' build system as well if I understand > correctly ? Well, not the change themselves, but building the package for Debian, yes. > > Please lemme know your thoughts on this because if that's the case I > would rather remove the app. than use the app. which has somewhat of a > limited functionality for me anyway. (Although was looking forward to > using the new release as a replacement for biggies like iceweasel > or/and chromium). Well, you're free to do whatever you want, here. Regards, -- Yves-Alexis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
