Your message dated Thu, 17 Apr 2008 00:37:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
has caused the report #470209,
regarding a DBLATEX_ROOT, please?
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s)
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
470209: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=470209
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Andreas,
On Wed, 16 Apr 2008 22:38:26 +0200, Andreas Hoenen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Benoît,
what's your opinion about the new wishlist bug report #470209 [1]?
After thinking about it for a while, I don't want to deviate from
upstream dblatex for it (although the Debian dblatex wrapper already
differs from the upstream one). [...]
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/470209
I guess there's something I've missed in the thread. Do you confirm the
wish is to be able to work with modules not installed in the default
library paths?
If so, why not simply doing:
export PYTHONPATH=/my/patched/python/modules
dblatex ...
Or:
PYTHONPATH=/my/patched/python/modules dblatex ...
?
Regards,
BG
--- End Message ---
