Your message dated Sat, 1 Aug 2015 21:47:18 -0400
with message-id <[email protected]>
has caused the report #776191,
regarding vim-common: xxd license is not documented in debian/copyright file
to be marked as having been forwarded to the upstream software
author(s)
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
776191: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776191
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Bram,
There was recently some discussion[0] about the licensing of xxd. The
result of which was Jürgen clarifying[1] that it should be dual-licensed
under MIT-X11 and GPL-2 (or later).
[0]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2015/01/msg00033.html
[1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2015/01/msg00037.html
Would you mind updating the license description in xxd.c?
Cheers,
--
James
GPG Key: 4096R/331BA3DB 2011-12-05 James McCoy <[email protected]>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---
